-
Contributors
Blogroll
- Above The Law
- Althouse
- Balkinazation
- Becker-Posner Blog
- BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
- Concurring Opinions
- Dorf on Law
- How Appealing
- Law.Com
- Most Strongly Supported
- Prawfsblawg
- Prison Law Blog
- SCOTUS Blog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
- Text & History
- The Confrontation Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Wait A Second!
- Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
The Cockle BurDisclaimer
Any commentary or opinions about cases, legal theory, legal strategy, court procedure, and all other content are the express opinion of their writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Cockle Law Brief Printing Co (“Cockle Law”), Cockle Bur, Inc. (“Cockle Bur”) its employees, owners, or users of this site. These commentary and opinions should be relied upon at your own risk. These commentary and opinions are not legal advice.
All information made available at www.Cocklebur.com is for informational purposes only. This website, and all content contained herein, is not meant to provide legal advice or answer specific legal question. It is not a substitute for legal advice. You should neither act, nor refrain from acting, based on information contained in this site; nor should you consider any blogs or other content posted on www.Cocklebur.com to be a substitute for proper legal research conducted by a licensed attorney. Visitors to this site should consult a licensed attorney before relying on any information found on this site.
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Cockle Law informs you that any U.S. federal tax advice or information contained in this site (including any blog post or on any site linked to or from www.Cocklebur.com) is not intended or written to be used, and can not be used, for the purpose of (I) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (II) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Monthly Archives: August 2011
Medium Rare Burgers and the Land of Laws
I’ve been away from blogging for about 10 days now. My wife and I drove across the country from Omaha to Seattle (my father-in-law and his wife flew our 19-month old son). We are somewhat moved into our new place and ready to start the next chapter, tentatively entitled “Baby Girls and Law School.” As many [...]
Posted in Uncategorized ( 1 Comment)
CockleBur Fantasy Football Preview
So, they finally got around to fixing that whole NFL lockout deal by figuring out a way to make the players happy and keep the owners rich by making the players rich and keeping the owners happy. And now that everyone is satisfied for at least another decade, we can finally go back to concentrating [...]
Posted in Sports ( Leave a comment)
New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing
We filed two merits briefs this week: Reply Brief in Howes v. Fields, No. 10-680, filed on August 8, 2011 Brief of Respondents in CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood, No. 10-948, filed on August 8, 2011
Posted in Uncategorized ( Leave a comment)
The Slippery Freefall
Dahlia Lithwick’s recent article in Slate covers developments in a couple of federal lawsuits brought by American citizens claiming they were unlawfully tortured and detained by our military while working in Iraq. (Both the trial court in one case, and the 7th Circuit in the other, held that former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is not [...]
Posted in Uncategorized ( Leave a comment)
Same words, different meanings…and?
Prof. Bell has a blog post objecting to both originalism and living constitutionalism because both interpretive theories lead to what he considers an objectionable outcome: the same word being used to mean different things within the document. This outcome, he contends, “threatens the rule of law” because “an average citizen, using ordinary English, would not [...]
Posted in Uncategorized ( Comments closed)
My Top Three Questions Presented from the Supreme Court’s 2010 Term
Tagged 2010 Term, Carter Phillips, Dan Himmelfarb, Dan Ortiz, Elena Kagan, Paul Clement, Peter Keisler, Questions Presented, Robert Owen, Seth Waxman, Theodore Bourtrous Jr.
As I explained last year, there may be no more daunting task in all Supreme Court practice than distilling a 9,000-word—or hopefully less—cert petition down to one or two Questions Presented. Although crafting QP’s are difficult, you can improve your QP’s by combining a few of the following techniques with lots of practice. In this [...]
Posted in Supreme Court ( Leave a comment)
The Case Against Law School: A Student’s View of the Law School Debate
Tagged David Lat, George Leef, law debt, law school, New York Times
“F*** greedy law schools” seems to be the phrase of the day. At least on the blogosphere. A few weeks ago, David Segal had an excellent expose on the culture of greed that permeates the business of law school. He appropriately entitled his piece: “Law School Economics: Ka-Ching!” The NY Times followed up with a [...]
Posted in Law School ( 4 Comments)
Cockle Printing Says Good Luck (But Never Goodbye) to One of Our Own
Last Friday Cockle Law Brief Printing Company said farewell to Shon Hopwood. This week Shon and his family–Annie, Mark, and the new baby on the way–will move to Seattle so that Shon can attend law school at the University of Washington. He promised us three things before he left: that he would always be more [...]
Posted in Uncategorized ( 1 Comment)
Just Another Day in Court
I came across this recent piece at Thomson Reuters–Oracle Judge Okays Damning E-mail Despite Google Privilege Claim–and I got to marvel, from a refreshingly safe distance, all the ways that things can go wrong in a courtroom. In its patent infringement case against Google, the Oracle team prepared an exhibit binder for a July 21st [...]
Posted in Uncategorized ( Leave a comment)

No, really, are there limits?