-
Contributors
Blogroll
- Above The Law
- Althouse
- Balkinazation
- Becker-Posner Blog
- BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
- Concurring Opinions
- Dorf on Law
- How Appealing
- Law.Com
- Most Strongly Supported
- Prawfsblawg
- Prison Law Blog
- SCOTUS Blog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
- Text & History
- The Confrontation Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Wait A Second!
- Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
The Cockle BurDisclaimer
Any commentary or opinions about cases, legal theory, legal strategy, court procedure, and all other content are the express opinion of their writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Cockle Law Brief Printing Co (“Cockle Law”), Cockle Bur, Inc. (“Cockle Bur”) its employees, owners, or users of this site. These commentary and opinions should be relied upon at your own risk. These commentary and opinions are not legal advice.
All information made available at www.Cocklebur.com is for informational purposes only. This website, and all content contained herein, is not meant to provide legal advice or answer specific legal question. It is not a substitute for legal advice. You should neither act, nor refrain from acting, based on information contained in this site; nor should you consider any blogs or other content posted on www.Cocklebur.com to be a substitute for proper legal research conducted by a licensed attorney. Visitors to this site should consult a licensed attorney before relying on any information found on this site.
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Cockle Law informs you that any U.S. federal tax advice or information contained in this site (including any blog post or on any site linked to or from www.Cocklebur.com) is not intended or written to be used, and can not be used, for the purpose of (I) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (II) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Monthly Archives: January 2012
The Mass Incarceration Problem
This week Adam Gopnik published a piece at The New Yorker on this country’s mass incarceration problem. Not only does it provide a number of sources and statistics to back up its claims, it also does so in a wonderful yet chilling way. The piece is long but well worth the read. You can find [...]
Posted in Prisoners ( Leave a comment)
If You Read About Politics, You Should Read These Guys: Greenwald and Friedersdorf
Between my first year of law school and two young children, I have really cut down on the amount of media I read in a given day. I tend to follow a pattern of checking the headlines at the New York Times, and then looking to see if any members of the Supreme Court press corps (mostly [...]
New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing
Brief for the Petitioner in Vasquez v. U.S., Inc., No. 11-199, filed on January 23, 2012 Brief for Petitioner in Hill v. U.S., No. 11-5721, filed on January 25, 2012 Brief for Petitioner in Dorsey v. U.S., No. 11-5683, filed on January 25, 2012
Posted in Uncategorized ( Leave a comment)
Unions and speech: the First Amendment requires opt-in, not opt-out
When it comes to free speech rights, the Supreme Court typically applies the rule of “strict scrutiny,” which holds that a government restriction on free speech is presumed unconstitutional, until the government proves otherwise. The reason is that, given the importance of freedom of speech, courts should “not presume acquiescence in the loss of fundamental [...]
Posted in Uncategorized ( Leave a comment)
The absence of state constitutional history
K.C. Johnson has an insightful blog post on the collapse of serious American history scholarship, due in large part to the influence of politically correct fads in the academy. Johnson notes that the recent Montana Supreme Court decision regarding campaign finance restrictions relied heavily on scholarship about Montana history, yet the court cited nothing published [...]
Posted in Uncategorized ( Comments closed)
Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum
The Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom has filed its Argument Supporting the Respondents, and Addressing the Minimum Coverage Provision in DHHS v. Florida, No. 11-398, and you can read it at the Cockle Printing website.
Posted in Uncategorized ( Leave a comment)
Attaching a GPS Device to a Car Is a Fourth Amendment Search
In a big loss for the federal government, the Supreme Court held today that when the government attaches a GPS device to a vehicle to monitor the vehicle’s movement, the government conducts a Fourth Amendment search. Justice Scalia wrote the opinion for the Court in United States v. Jones, No. 10-1259, backed by the Chief Justice, [...]
Posted in Criminal Law, Supreme Court ( 1 Comment)
Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum
Three sets of amici have recently filed briefs in DHHS v. Florida, No. 11-398: Brief Amici Curiae of Prescription Policy Choices, Professors of Law, and Professors of Health Policy in Support of Petitioners on the Minimum Coverage Provision Brief of Health Care For All, Inc., Health Law Advocates, Inc. The Massachusetts Hospital Association, Inc., The [...]
Posted in Uncategorized ( Leave a comment)
New Merits Brief Filed by Cockle Printing
Brief for Respondent in U.S. v. Alvarez, Inc., No. 11-210, filed on January 13, 2012 Brief for Petitioners in Reichle v. Howards, No. 11-262, filed on January 19, 2012
Posted in Uncategorized ( Leave a comment)

Does Government Need the Power to Install a GPS Device Without First Obtaining a Warrant?