Andy Cockle

Andy Cockle

acockle@website.com

Website: http://www.cocklelaw.com

Andy is a third generation legal brief printer. Cockle Law Brief Printing was founded in 1923 by Andy’s grandparents, who were both attorneys. At that time, the Cockles worked primarily with briefs that were filed in the Nebraska Supreme Court. In the 1980s, Andy and Trish—Andy’s sister and partner—guided the company to specialize in U.S. Supreme Court briefs.

Andy is a lifelong resident of Omaha, and he obtained a Business degree from the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He started working at Cockle Law Brief Printing in 1982. Andy schedules briefs, handles marketing, tracks the Supreme Court’s docket, and fields the myriad questions that attorneys ask him in regard to filing a U.S. Supreme Court brief.

He enjoys handball, rollerblading, reading and with his wife, Mary Helen, traveling to visit his two grown children.

Andy Cockle

Andy is a third generation legal brief printer. Cockle Law Brief Printing was founded in 1923 by Andy’s grandparents, who were both attorneys. At that time, the Cockles worked primarily with briefs that were filed in the Nebraska Supreme Court. In the 1980s, Andy and Trish—Andy’s sister and partner—guided the company to specialize in U.S. Supreme Court briefs.

Andy is a lifelong resident of Omaha, and he obtained a Business degree from the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He started working at Cockle Law Brief Printing in 1982. Andy schedules briefs, handles marketing, tracks the Supreme Court’s docket, and fields the myriad questions that attorneys ask him in regard to filing a U.S. Supreme Court brief.

He enjoys handball, rollerblading, reading and with his wife, Mary Helen, traveling to visit his two grown children.

Recent Posts:

New Merits Brief Filed by Cockle Printing

Reply Brief for Petitioner in Dorsey v. U.S., No. 11-5683, filed on April 5, 2012.

New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing

Brief for Petitioner in Kloeckner v. Solis, No. 11-184, filed on March 28, 2012. Brief on the Merits for Petitioner in Johnson v. Williams, No. 11-465, filed on March 28, 2012.

New Merits Brief Filed by Cockle Printing

Brief for Respondent David Patchak in the vided cases of Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak, No. 11-246, and Salazar v. Patchak, No. 11-247, filed on March 20, 2012.

New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing

Reply Brief for Petitioner in Miller v. Alabama, No. 10-9646, filed on March 12, 2012. Reply Brief for Petitioner in Jackson v. Hobbs, No. 10-9647, filed on March 12, 2012. Reply Brief for the Petitioner in Vasquez v. U.S., No. 11-199, filed on March 12, 2012. Reply Brief for Petitioners in Reichle v. Howards, No. [...]

New Merits Brief Filed by Cockle Printing

Brief for Respondent in RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 11-166, filed on March 2, 2012.

New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing

Brief for Respondent in Reichle v. Howards, No. 11-262, filed on February 20, 2012 Reply Brief for Petitioners in Armour v. Indianapolis, No. 11-161, filed on February 20, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

Friday was the due date for amici filing in support of the Administration on the Medicaid question. You can find two briefs filed by Cockle Printing at our website: Brief of Amici Curiae Health Law & Policy Scholars and Prescription Policy Choices in Support of Respondents on the Constitutional Validity of the Medicaid Expansion Brief [...]

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

Last week was a big one in the Supreme Court’s healthcare cases. Three different amicus due dates fell during the week, including a filing deadline for opponents of the controversial individual mandate. Here are some the amicus briefs we filed supporting the Respondents on the Minimum Coverage Provision Issue (and you can find links to each [...]

New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing

Brief for Respondent in Jackson v. Hobbs, No. 10-9647, filed on February 14, 2012 Brief of Respondent in Miller v. Alabama, No. 10-9646, filed on February 14, 2012 Petitioners’ Reply Brief in Elgin v. Dept. of the Treasury, No. 11-45, filed on February 15, 2012

Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum

The States of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Vermont, the District of Columbia, and the Governor of Washington have filed their Brief as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents on Severability in the vided cases of NFIB v. Sebelius, and Florida v. DHHS, Nos. 11-393 & 11-400, [...]

Recent Comments: