-
Contributors
Blogroll
- Above The Law
- Althouse
- Balkinazation
- Becker-Posner Blog
- BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
- Concurring Opinions
- Dorf on Law
- How Appealing
- Law.Com
- Most Strongly Supported
- Prawfsblawg
- Prison Law Blog
- SCOTUS Blog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
- Text & History
- The Confrontation Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Wait A Second!
- Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
The Cockle BurDisclaimer
Any commentary or opinions about cases, legal theory, legal strategy, court procedure, and all other content are the express opinion of their writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Cockle Law Brief Printing Co (“Cockle Law”), Cockle Bur, Inc. (“Cockle Bur”) its employees, owners, or users of this site. These commentary and opinions should be relied upon at your own risk. These commentary and opinions are not legal advice.
All information made available at www.Cocklebur.com is for informational purposes only. This website, and all content contained herein, is not meant to provide legal advice or answer specific legal question. It is not a substitute for legal advice. You should neither act, nor refrain from acting, based on information contained in this site; nor should you consider any blogs or other content posted on www.Cocklebur.com to be a substitute for proper legal research conducted by a licensed attorney. Visitors to this site should consult a licensed attorney before relying on any information found on this site.
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Cockle Law informs you that any U.S. federal tax advice or information contained in this site (including any blog post or on any site linked to or from www.Cocklebur.com) is not intended or written to be used, and can not be used, for the purpose of (I) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (II) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Creighton Law School Is Reducing the Size of Its Incoming Class; Nebraska Prisons Are Overcrowded
Although there were several interesting SCOTUS decisions handed down yesterday, I instead decided to cover some local issues with national implications.
Creighton University School of Law announced that they are reducing the number of seats for incoming law school students. Tthe Omaha World Herald’s story leads with this:
Dean Marianne Culhane wrote a letter to Creighton Law alumni saying that although “demand for a Creighton legal educations remains high . . . we feel a moral obligation to admit fewer students until employment prospects for new attorneys improve.”
Over at Above the Law, Elie Mystal was skeptical of Dean Culhane’s explanation, claiming that: “Law school deans who take seriously their responsibilities to those they entice into a legal education don’t really exist.”
In my view that seems to be an unwarranted judgment. I had lunch with Dean Culhane in May, and she voiced her concerns about the lagging job market for law school graduates and touched on Creighton Law’s plan to reduce numbers at the school. I can say, unequivocally, that Dean Culhane has a genuine concern for her students and that is the one reason CLS made the move.
The ABA Journal also has coverage of the story here.
Update: I received an email from Dean Culhanne. She graciously deflected credit for the change in class size, and she said CLS’s move was a “faculty-driven decision” supported by the University President and others.
On the prison front, Nebraska Corrections Director Bob Houston acknowledged that the state is losing the battle to reduce prison overcrowding. The Omaha World Herald starts the story with this:
It will be interesting to see if the Nebraska legislature enacts some changes to ameliorate the overcrowding problem or if the State will go the California route—forced to make changes by prisoners’ rights litigation in federal courts.