One Month Down

I am officially finished with my first month of law school. I must say it was exhausting.

But other than that, I have little to complain about. My professors are great (and I’m not just saying that to kiss their you know what!), my classmates are likeable (my small section is completely devoid of gunners), and the classes are engaging.

There were a few surprises along the way. The course that gave me the most boredom concern was contract law. But what I’ve found is that contract law is full of surprises, like the fact that there was math involved (I’d hoped to never see another math problem after undergrad. Ever!). Contract law also provides a whole host of policy issues that I’ve never bothered to consider, such as that efficient breaches are good for the economy. Then there is the fun sounding vocabulary, things like “making the person whole,” “expectation damages,” and “mitigation.” So contract law has far surpassed what little expectations I had of it.

My main beef with law school is the case method. I understand the pedagogical qualities that it brings, but it just seems like madness. If someone hired me to write a brief in a particular area of which I was unfamiliar, the last place I would start my research is by delving into the minutiae of Supreme Court decisions where the standard seems to change with each successive case. Or by studying a common law case from 1850 something. No, I would read a hornbook or law review article that gives a broad overview of the law so I could eat the whole pie rather than just a slice. I am a glutton that way. I can’t stand the suspense; I want to know what the relevant standard is NOW!

One other note: Dear Supreme Court, could you please stick to the doctrine of stare decisis rather than these stealth overrulings. In addition to being disengenous, you are creating a lot of needless work for law school students who are stuck trying to make sense of the mess you’ve created.

Anyway, I have about 25 pages of reading to do yet tonight and an extra assignment. So that’s it folks.

P.S. I take that back Supreme Court; I love you.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Any commentary or opinions about cases, legal theory, legal strategy, court procedure, and all other content are the express opinion of their writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Cockle Law Brief Printing Co (“Cockle Law”), Cockle Bur, Inc. (“Cockle Bur”) its employees, owners, or users of this site. These commentary and opinions should be relied upon at your own risk. These commentary and opinions are not legal advice.

All information made available at www.Cocklebur.com is for informational purposes only. This website, and all content contained herein, is not meant to provide legal advice or answer specific legal question. It is not a substitute for legal advice. You should neither act, nor refrain from acting, based on information contained in this site; nor should you consider any blogs or other content posted on www.Cocklebur.com to be a substitute for proper legal research conducted by a licensed attorney. Visitors to this site should consult a licensed attorney before relying on any information found on this site.

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Cockle Law informs you that any U.S. federal tax advice or information contained in this site (including any blog post or on any site linked to or from www.Cocklebur.com) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (I) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (II) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

*Select to accept terms
*