The State of the NBA

and tagged , ,

The several years behind us and before us will define the future of the NBA. The denigration of competitive spirit and moral fiber amongst certain players and upper management has left an irreparable stain on the legacy of the game that in the past brought us pioneers and idols like Jordan, Russell, Magic, Bird, Chamberlain, etc. The question is…how long will this go on? Will the fans and the sports community do their duty to end this behavior and bring the absentee sense of integrity back to the game of basketball? These answers should emerge in the near future.

How can the everyday American relate to Dwight Howard? We can’t, not a single one of us. Dwight preached “loyalty,” (yes, this is very real) while destroying the Orlando Magic front office and giving up on his teammates and fans, effectively holding a franchise hostage for over a year. Almost as embarrassing was his public statement, “there are a lot of nights where I don’t sleep, ” regarding the self-induced uncertainty in the destination of his playing future. Dwight, you have a max contract in the NBA. You are living every boy’s dream, playing a game for millions of dollars while also collecting an absurd stream of endorsement money. That statement is a slap in the face to the American public, many of whom are struggling to make end’s meet in the current recession. The American public has reason to lose sleep at night, Dwight Howard does not.

So how did things get this bad? The reasonable response is to begin with the advent of free agency in the NBA. Hell, teams have been moving around as long as players have. As Trey Parker and Matt Stone wrote in the film Baseketball, “The Minneapolis Lakers moved to Los Angeles, where there are no lakes. The Oilers moved to Tennessee, where there is no oil. The Jazz moved to Salt Lake City, where they don’t allow music.” The latest example is the movement of what was formerly the Seattle Supersonics franchise to Oklahoma City, which has left a nigh irreparable relationship between the people of Seattle and the NBA, Commissioner David Stern, and owner Clay Bennett. The tongue-in-cheek of Parker and Stone highlighted a negative trend in professional sports, the love of the game being left behind in the pursuit of big business.

In recent years, the decision to test free agency has been amplified by larger contracts and the “super friends” mentality. There were days in the past when a star leaving a team for their rival was seen by fans on the same level as committing adultery (e.g. my own and this little girl’s current feelings towards Steve Nash). This is now accepted as business as usual every offseason. A generation ago, players stayed with their respective teams for the majority of their careers. These players cultivated friendly (or not so friendly) rivalries with certain opposing teams or players. They stayed true to the front office that took a chance on them, the teammates that treated them like family, and the fans that embraced them. They were appreciative.

The current media age, coupled with ease of travel and communication, has galvanized a generation of young players. Rather than creating rivals, these players are constructing lasting bonds and friendships. These players have known each other since their AAU and college recruitment days; they watch each other play on TV every night. Social media keeps them only seconds apart at all times. So why would these superstars want to play against their close friends when the NBA has given them the chance to team up? The NBA is enabling and cultivating this selfish attitude in its star and even mid-level players; it is unacceptable.

What many teams had anticipated for years, the epic 2010 free agent class, turned into every small/medium market NBA team’s nightmare. Pat Riley saw an unprecedented opportunity, exposed a loophole in the system, and signed to the Miami Heat three of the top ten players in the league. The rest is history, and now every big market NBA team is scrambling to keep pace. Two years ago we saw Carmelo Anthony pout his way from the Denver Nuggets to the New York Knicks to join up with Amar’e Stoudemire, as they both awaited the potential arrival of Chris Paul. Last season Dwight Howard began his drama; he is currently lobbying to be traded to the Brooklyn Nets, also known as Deron Williams and Joe Johnson (talks seem to be dead for the moment). The Lakers have a big three of Kobe Bryant, Andrew Bynum, and Steve Nash (not to mention Pau Gasol), and are also in on the talks for Howard. The dynamic of the NBA is changing. Rather than being dictated by the spirit of competition and the enjoyment of the fans, the players are taking over more than anyone could have envisioned, in any professional sport. When you put only five starters on the floor, the impact of one player is greater than it is in football, baseball, or hockey. LeBron James departure from Cleveland is the paramount example, dropping the Cavaliers from first to worst immediately after taking his talents to South Beach.

So how can the small market teams keep up? How will the NBA balance the business interests of the franchises and the league with the individual interests these “super friends” and big market teams are creating? The answers are unknown; the next several years will help shake things out and determine which direction the league is ultimately headed. Ideally league officials will find a way to stymy this trend before it creates severe negative shockwaves throughout the NBA. Current hope for change can be found in Oklahoma City, one of the few teams in the league that has built a serious contender by hitting home runs with their draft picks and filling out their roster with contributors who don’t demand max salaries, a near NFL success model (honorable mentions to the Philadelphia 76ers, Memphis Grizzlies, and Indiana Pacers, several young teams on the rise). If teams built in the model of OKC can beat back these “super teams,” owners and GMs may revert to the more balanced/traditional method of assembling rosters. This will benefit the competitive balance and the team-first mentality that seems to be disappearing from the NBA at an alarming rate.


  1. Posted:   July 25, 2012
    Name:   Paul Rinn

    I didn’t think there was a chance in hell that Ray Allen would sign with Miami (especially for half of what Boston was offering), and yet that’s what happened. When Boston’s “big three” joined forces, it was an act of desperate measure by a few guys whose window of opportunity to win a ring was coming to an end, and I didn’t mind it so much. In fact, I cheered them on to beat LA because the Lakers were like the Yankees, a juggernaut that was always making big free agent moves in order to give themselves an advantage over the rest of the league. When Miami’s “big three” came together, it felt cheap because LeBron and company were still in their prime and would have another decade to win a title. There was no desperate measure to their allegiance. LeBron could’ve stayed in Cleveland (or come to Chicago) and still would’ve been able to “compete” for a ring. And if he tried and failed for another five years, I wouldn’t have been upset if he joined forces with his nemesi to win a ring before he retired. But Ray Allen already got his ring. There isn’t much difference between one ring and two, so why would he sell his teammates out to join forces with the enemy? Boston has a good team, and they were this close to being in the Finals; why wouldn’t he fight for a ring with the same group of guys who’ve been fighting beside him for the past 5 seasons rather than jump in the backseat and sleep his way toward another championship. I hope this one comes back to bite him.

  2. Posted:   July 31, 2012
    Name:   J X A

    This post regarding the NBA is spot on. The league, through free agency and the decision by David Stern to market people not teams has destroyed the NBA just as surely as SportsCenter and its incessant broadcasting of dunks and three pointers and “cherry on top” passes.

    David Stern: Your league will soon go the way of the way of the Heavyweight Title Fight and the dodo bird. The solution is to fundamentally change the way teams are contructed. A foundational change will work for the long haul. Free agency has to change and the players have to be educated about why it needs to change. Media outlets have to learn to re-market the game so that the focus returns to the game and the teams and fades from the faces of the players.

    IT is true in a many sports but especially the NBA. I can still tell you the lineup of the Buffalo Braves and the Baltimore Bullets (go Jack Marin go) but I cant tell you the lineup of the Grizzlies or even the “Wizards” from two years ago.

    Can you name one player since Bird and Magic that has played his entire career with the same team and has had a ten year career? Can you even name three that have had stints of more than 7 years with any team?

    There are guys that meet those criteria, but the point is….we have to put on our thinking caps to name them.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Any commentary or opinions about cases, legal theory, legal strategy, court procedure, and all other content are the express opinion of their writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Cockle Law Brief Printing Co (“Cockle Law”), Cockle Bur, Inc. (“Cockle Bur”) its employees, owners, or users of this site. These commentary and opinions should be relied upon at your own risk. These commentary and opinions are not legal advice.

All information made available at is for informational purposes only. This website, and all content contained herein, is not meant to provide legal advice or answer specific legal question. It is not a substitute for legal advice. You should neither act, nor refrain from acting, based on information contained in this site; nor should you consider any blogs or other content posted on to be a substitute for proper legal research conducted by a licensed attorney. Visitors to this site should consult a licensed attorney before relying on any information found on this site.

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Cockle Law informs you that any U.S. federal tax advice or information contained in this site (including any blog post or on any site linked to or from is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (I) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (II) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

*Select to accept terms