Filing a Reply Brief on the Petition Stage in the U.S. Supreme Court

and tagged , ,

I still receive calls from attorneys regarding the timing and procedure for filing a reply brief on the petition stage.  The Supreme Court’s Rules on this subject are somewhat vague on the timing and provide little guidance on the procedure for printing and filing reply briefs.  So I am re-posting this article I first posted at Cockle Printing to clear up any confusion on the process.

Most attorneys’ inclination is to file a reply brief before the clerk distributes the petition and brief in opposition to the Court for consideration.  According to experts, this is a wise practice given that the Justice’s clerks begin writing cert memos on the petition shortly after distribution.  Without a reply brief in hand, there is the risk that a clerk will view the respondent’s contentions without rebuttal and craft a cert memo accordingly.   See Eugene Gressman, et al., Supreme Court Practice at 509 (9th ed.) (“To do any good, the [reply] brief must be submitted for the Court to read it before it acts on the petition.  This means that, to be effective, the reply brief should be available to the Justices (or their clerks) when they read the brief in opposition shortly after the case is circulated.”);  Timothy Bishop,  et al., Tips on Petitioning for and Opposing Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court at 4 (“…the petitioner should aim to file a reply within ten days after the brief in opposition is filed so that the respondent’s arguments do not go (even temporarily) unchallenged.”).

Under Supreme Court Rule 15.5, the Clerk will distribute the petition for writ of certiorari and the brief in opposition for the Court’s consideration no less than 10 days after the brief in opposition is filed.  The 10-day deferral of distribution period is not, however, the actual filing due date.   Since the Court only distributes once a week, the petitioner will often have a few days beyond the 10-day deferral period.  For example, if a brief in opposition was filed on May 4, 2011, and the 10-day period ends on May 14, 2011, the next available distribution date for paid petitions is May 17, 2011, and therefore, that is the actual filing due date. 

You can determine the distribution date for your petition from the Court’s case distribution schedule, which can be viewed here.

The process for printing and filing a reply brief at Cockle is straightforward (I am unaware of the process at other brief printers but I would bet it is similar).  Once the distribution date is determined, it is Cockle practice to print and mail the reply brief the day before distribution.  Cockle confirms, on the day of distribution, that the briefs were delivered to the Court.  They then email an electronic PDF version of the reply brief to Deputy Clerk Chris Vasil.  Since the paper briefs are sent off-site for anthrax screening, Mr. Vasil distributes the PDF version to the Court.  The PDF is later replaced with the paper briefs once screening is complete.

3 Trackbacks

  1. By Friday round-up at the nclawtalk blog on May 6, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    [...] the  CockleBur, Shon Hopwood discusses the logistics for filing a reply brief at the cert. [...]

  2. By Friday round-up | theConstitutional.org on May 7, 2011 at 1:35 am

    [...] the  CockleBur, Shon Hopwood discusses the logistics for filing a reply brief at the cert. [...]

  3. [...] distribution dates are important for determining the due date of cert stage  reply [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Any commentary or opinions about cases, legal theory, legal strategy, court procedure, and all other content are the express opinion of their writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Cockle Law Brief Printing Co (“Cockle Law”), Cockle Bur, Inc. (“Cockle Bur”) its employees, owners, or users of this site. These commentary and opinions should be relied upon at your own risk. These commentary and opinions are not legal advice.

All information made available at www.Cocklebur.com is for informational purposes only. This website, and all content contained herein, is not meant to provide legal advice or answer specific legal question. It is not a substitute for legal advice. You should neither act, nor refrain from acting, based on information contained in this site; nor should you consider any blogs or other content posted on www.Cocklebur.com to be a substitute for proper legal research conducted by a licensed attorney. Visitors to this site should consult a licensed attorney before relying on any information found on this site.

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Cockle Law informs you that any U.S. federal tax advice or information contained in this site (including any blog post or on any site linked to or from www.Cocklebur.com) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (I) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (II) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

*Select to accept terms
*